Get Your Baby’s Hearing Screened

The majority of children can hear and listen from birth. They learn to talk by imitating both the voices of their parents and relatives and the sounds around them.

Unfortunately, this is not the case for all children. Two to Three percent of children in the United States either are born deaf or are hard-of-hearing; and many more lose their hearing during childhood. It is imperative that deafness or hearing loss is detected as early as possible as these babies may need to learn verbal communication and language differently.

At what stage should I have my baby’s hearing screened?

Hearing screening should take place within the first month of life. Make sure you see a hearing expert (Audiologist) if hearing loss is suspected; they should test your baby’s hearing within three months of age and if hearing loss is established it is important to think about the use of hearing devices or other communication options by six months of age.

Where do I go to get my baby’s hearing screened?

Many hospitals routinely screen all newborns for hearing loss. Some hospitals only screen those newborns considered to be at high risk of hearing loss, such as infants that have a family history of deafness or hearing problems, low birth weight, or certain other medical conditions.

It is important for your baby to be screened as many children with no risk factors whose parents and grandparents have normal hearing can be born with hearing loss. It is a good idea to find out what your hospital does. If you are already home with your baby and you are unsure if your baby’s hearing was tested, ask the doctor or the clinic where your baby’s records are.

Many States have passed Early Hearing Detection and Intervention legislation and a few Sates frequently screen the hearing of most newborn babies although there is no legislation requiring it. If you would like to find out what your State does regarding the hearing screening for babies, you can browse the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) web site at www.asha.org.

How is hearing screening preformed on babies?

There are two tests used to screen hearing in babies, both of which require no activity from the baby other than lying still.

The first the Otoacoustic emissions (OAE) test shows if part of the ear is responding correctly to sound, a sponge earphone is positioned in the ear canal during this test and the ear is stimulated with sound, the “echo” is then measured. Everyone with normal hearing has this “echo” therefore if this is missing it could be an indicator of hearing loss.

The second test is the auditory brain stem response (ABR) test, which checks how the brain and the brain stem respond to sound. During this test, electrodes are positioned on the ears and head and the child wears earphones. A child should be calm and quiet during this test so a mild sedative may be administered. Electrical activity in your child’s brain, when they should be hearing, is then measured when a doctor or nurse sends sounds through the earphones

If the response from the child is not consistent for the duration of these tests, a follow up hearing screening and referral to an audiologist may be suggested by your doctor. This is to provide a more comprehensive hearing evaluation.

How important is it to have my baby’s hearing screened early?

Children begin learning speech and language within the first 6 months, the most important time for exposure to language and learning is the first three years. Research shows that early intervention for the hearing impaired produces better language skills and also the sooner you know about hearing lose or deafness, the sooner you can ensure your child benefits from strategies designed to help them learn to communicate.

Popularity: 7% [?]

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • Reddit

What is causing the increase in Autism?

Dear Parent,


Did you know, researchers say they are baffled by the skyrocketing number of autism cases among California children?

The rise has little to do with evolving diagnostic methods and population increases, according to a study by the University of California, Davis. A previous report showed an increase of 273 percent in the number of reported autism cases in California between 1987 and 1998.

“It is astounding to see a threefold increase in autism with no explanation,” said Dr. Robert Byrd, an epidemiologist who led the study. “There’s a number of things that need to be answered.

We need to rethink the possible causes of autism.” Autism affects a person’s ability to communicate, form relationships with others and respond to their environment.

The study, funded by $1 million in state money, collected data from 684 autistic children throughout California.

Researchers found that changes in diagnosing autism over the years and population growth did not account for the increasing number of cases. The next obstacle is to pinpoint a cause for the outbreak, Byrd said. Researchers have discussed several possible causes, including childhood vaccinations and genetics.

“All these things are out there without anything saying what these numbers really mean,” he said. Some researchers said they believed the autism numbers are even higher.

Dr. Bernard Rimland, director of the Autism Research Institute in San Diego, said the UC Davis study dramatically undercounted autism cases.

“I certainly am pleased that they finally acknowledge that there is an increase,” Rimland said. “However, the numbers they gave are nonsense. They’re kind of minimizing it.”

Hopefully the money that will fund the study will not be given by the drug companies that make vaccinations!

Six new vaccines were added to the mandatory vaccination schedule in the U.S. between 1963 and 1998, including five doses of live oral polio; two doses of live measles, mumps and rubella; four doses of HIB; and three doses of hepatitis B vaccine.

During the same time period, vaccination coverage rates rose in American children under age three from between 60 and 80 percent in 1967 for MMR, polio and DPT vaccines to between 80 and 95 percent coverages in 1997 for DPT; MMR, polio, HIB, and hepatitis B vaccines.

There are plans for up to ten new vaccinations to go through FDA approval this decade, mostly for sexually transmitted diseases. When will it end?

TIP: Learn the truth about these dangerous toxic chemicals that are being injected into your children! Visit here for more info.

In health,

Thomas Von Ohlen, MS

Thomas Von Ohlen, MS is a clinical nutritionist and developer of Plasma Pro software for doctors. After suffering for many years as a child and young adult with his own health ailments, he dedicated all his time to finding the truth about health. Today he continues that same dedication to helping others who are sick and tired of being sick and tired. In his 15 years in private practice he has helped thousands of people, from all over the world achieve their health goals through education and specific product recommendations. His FREE newsletter is available at http://www.healyourbodynow.com

Popularity: 5% [?]

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • Reddit